WILDLIFE IN THE WAR ZONE by Amit Goswamy, wildlife biologist and former deputy commander of the Indian Armed Forces, Border Security Force. ...

Read more

Ecology: Are you in fashion? No longer a company without its environmental charter, no more a product without its eco-responsible promises, no more a speech coated with ecolo...

Read more

We know that recycling cans and taking shorter showers are not enough. On the occasion of Earth Day this April 22, PETA recalls that the last alarming IPCC report calls for a dr...

Read more

Not a fan of Unabomber. “When the hares declared equal rights between animals, they wanted to ostracize the lions; they didn't answer, but they bared their teeth &r...

Read more

Radioactive leak in Taishan: it's just a minor incident.

EPR at Taishan. | Posted on 2021-06-17 18:36

As a follow-up to our article yesterday about the radioactive leak detected on EDF's EPR reactor in the city of Taishan in China, the Chinese authorities came out of their reservations by indicating that they recognized a minor incident.

The radioactivity just increased a little. This is how China describes what happened in the Taishan plant, involving five damaged fuel rods. These bars, which contain uranium pellets and provide energy in the core of the nuclear reactor, would have generated an accumulation of radioactive gases. And although they concede an increase in radioactivity inside one of the reactors, the authorities wanted to be reassuring and of course ruled out any danger, explaining that this kind of incident is quite normal due to “Uncontrollable factors” during the manufacturing, transport or installation process in the plant. In a statement, they indicated that the increase in radioactivity in the plant is "within the regulatory range" but "there is no radioactive leakage into the environment," said the statement.

On the side of EDF, however, this series of bad news is not the best effect. The image of its flagship is again somewhat tarnished. For a long time now, this new technology has been accompanied by significant additional costs and numerous setbacks. Starting with the first EPR project which began in 2005 in Olkiluoto (Finland) on behalf of the electrician TVO and which should not start until early 2022, almost ten years late. There is, then that of Flamanville, in France, which found itself confronted with anomalies discovered on the composition of the steel of the lid and the bottom of the tank. Now it's China's turn.

That's a lot for EDF. The lessons will have to be learned quickly if the group wants to continue selling EPRs in the rest of the world and to affirm that this technology offers good power and safety.

Posted on 2021-06-17 18:36

WIZARDWORDS  3.0 RECYCLING IS A LIE AND EVERYONE KNEW IT. This next edition of the WIZARDWORDS looks at recycling and what role it will play in the solutions for the ...

Read more

Michelle Thew is the CEO of Cruelty Free International – the leading organization working to end animal testing worldwide. For more than 20 years, Michelle has been an adv...

Read more

Live debate

Climate denial: can we still look elsewhere?


No messages currently, be the first!

What are the main drivers of deforestation and forest degradation and which role the financial system has to play? Luciane Moessa, Ph.D., Fernanda Bianco, M.Sc. ...

Read more

DV8 Chat

Find your friends on DV8 Chat.



Receive news directly to your email!